Deploy and manage enterprise AI operations with controls you can actually trust.

Q: How do you guarantee the AI will not hallucinate or make unapproved changes in production systems?

We apply defence-in-depth: deterministic guardrails, structured JSON schema outputs, confidence score thresholds, and Human-in-the-Loop 2.0 approval gates so consequential actions cannot execute without logged human sign-off.

Generative AI is impressive, but running autonomous systems that reason, execute tools, and mutate operational databases requires hardened AI Operations. We build governed multi-agent state machines, standardise tool access via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), and enforce immutable human approval gates.

What we deliver

Model Context Protocol (MCP) Tool Servers: Standardised, decoupled tool servers exposing internal databases, ERPs, and APIs to frontier LLMs without fragile bespoke glue code.
Governed Multi-Agent Orchestration: State-machine architectures (LangGraph, CrewAI) organising specialised sub-agents under hierarchical supervisors with state persistence and deterministic error recovery.
Permission-Aware Enterprise RAG: Semantic search pipelines querying SharePoint, Jira, Confluence, and Vector DBs while strictly enforcing Azure AD / Okta user permissions with zero cross-tenant leakage.
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL 2.0) Approval Pipelines: Interactive approval gates in Slack, Microsoft Teams, or custom web interfaces with immutable audit logging before any consequential system mutation occurs.
LLMOps Observability & Deprecation Management: Full trace capture via Langfuse / OpenTelemetry, real-time token unit economics, latency monitoring, and automated regression test suites across model upgrades.

Common engagement patterns

Common scenario: Internal knowledge agent with permission-aware RAG over enterprise silos.

Typical approach: Hybrid RAG architecture (pgvector + BM25) querying SharePoint, Confluence, and Jira while enforcing Azure AD / Okta user-level ACLs and verbatim citation traceability.

Typical timeline: 3-5 weeks

Indicative outcome: 25-35% reduction in internal lookup time with zero cross-department data leakage (McKinsey).

Common scenario: Multi-agent operational workflows for complex multi-step processes.

Typical approach: Designed with LangGraph and MCP, structuring specialised agents (research, verification, calculation, ERP write) orchestrated by a supervisor agent with state checkpointing.

Typical timeline: 6-10 weeks

Indicative outcome: 60% reduction in processing cycle times and 4x operator throughput with deterministic quality (Forrester).

Common scenario: Governed decision support with Human-in-the-Loop (HITL 2.0) gates.

Typical approach: AI synthesis pipelines that prepare complete decision dossiers with source citations, requiring cryptographically logged human approval via Slack or Teams before updating core records.

Typical timeline: 4-6 weeks

Indicative outcome: 50% faster decision velocity while preserving 100% human accountability and APRA/ASIC compliance (Gartner).

Common scenario: Enterprise Model Context Protocol (MCP) server infrastructure.

Typical approach: Decoupled enterprise MCP servers exposing CRM, ERP, and internal databases to frontier LLMs via standardised open protocols, eliminating fragile custom glue code.

Typical timeline: 2-4 weeks

Indicative outcome: 70% reduction in custom integration maintenance and instant swappability across model providers.

Tools & Frameworks

Claude 3.7 / 3.5 SonnetLangGraphCrewAIModel Context Protocol (MCP)Langfusepgvector / QdrantOpenAI GPT-4oGemini 1.5 ProAzure OpenAIOpenTelemetry

We are model-agnostic but strongly architect with Claude 3.7/3.5 Sonnet and LangGraph for complex enterprise AI orchestration.

Enterprise AIOps

Ready to operationalise AI?

Assess your organisation's technical readiness for governed multi-agent operations or speak directly with Bennet.

Start readiness audit Consult an orchestration expert

Our 4-Step AIOps Methodology

Operational Surface & Risk Audit

We analyse your target workflows, model constraints, data sensitivity, and regulatory boundaries to define strict deterministic failure guards.

Prototype & MCP Sandbox Isolation

We build isolated multi-agent prototypes with synthetic prompt batteries to rigorously evaluate reasoning logic, tool execution, and guardrail resilience.

Governed Production Deployment

We deploy multi-agent systems with MCP sandboxing, deterministic state machines, user-level ACLs, and interactive human-in-the-loop gates.

LLMOps Observability & Continuous Evaluation

We configure token tracking, latency monitoring, prompt drift detection, and automated regression test suites across frontier model updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions regarding multi-agent orchestration, MCP, and AI governance.

What is the difference between simple generative AI wrappers and true AI Operations (AIOps)?

Simple wrappers send unstructured prompts to an API with no state management, guardrails, or system access controls. True AI Operations involves orchestrating deterministic multi-agent state machines, enforcing schema validation on tool calls, managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) data servers, isolating sensitive data, and monitoring token latency and drift with full observability.

How does Model Context Protocol (MCP) improve security compared to legacy API integrations?

MCP standardises how AI models discover and interact with tools and resources. Instead of embedding static API keys and complex prompt-injected SQL commands, MCP servers enforce explicit read/write boundaries, session-scoped permissions, and structured schemas, ensuring models can only execute pre-authorized operations.

How do you guarantee the AI will not hallucinate or make unapproved changes in production systems?

We apply a defence-in-depth architecture: deterministic guardrails, structured JSON schema outputs, confidence score thresholds, and Human-in-the-Loop 2.0 approval gates. Consequential actions (such as financial transactions or CRM deletes) cannot execute without cryptographically logged human sign-off.

How do you handle model deprecation and prompt drift when OpenAI or Anthropic release new models?

We maintain synthetic test batteries and evaluation pipelines (Evals). Before upgrading production endpoints from Claude 3.5 to Claude 3.7 or GPT-4o, we run thousands of automated test cases against your real-world scenarios to verify that reasoning, latency, and tool selection remain 100% compliant with expected performance baselines.

How do you comply with Australian data privacy laws and enterprise data residency requirements?

We deploy architectures with zero data retention (ZDR) enterprise agreements, leveraging Australian-hosted model endpoints (such as Azure OpenAI Australia East or AWS Sydney) and private VPC vector databases. Your enterprise data is never used to train frontier foundation models.

Governed AI Architecture

Deploy governed multi-agent operations with enterprise controls

Move beyond brittle chatbots and unmonitored scripts. Partner with senior AI engineers to deploy governed multi-agent systems and MCP tooling with strict auditability.

Book AI Operations Discovery Assess AI Readiness View Pricing How We Work →